2 Dakika Kural için C# IStructuralEquatable Nasıl kullanılır

2 Dakika Kural için C# IStructuralEquatable Nasıl kullanılır

Blog Article

Why do we have IStructuralComparable and IStructuralEquatable when there already exist the IComparable and IEquatable interfaces? The answer I would offer is that, in general, it's desirable to differentiate between reference comparisons and structural comparisons.

= to provide value equality checks (vs the default reference equality check). The MSDN documentation suggests you only do it for immutable types. There are also issues involving interfaces and operator overloading.

Reference types (read classes) don't benefit bey much. The IEquatable implementation does let you avoid a cast from System.Object but that's a very trivial gain. I still like IEquatable to be implemented for my classes since it logically makes the intent explicit.

Does anyone know what happens if you do not implement iequtalable when using generic collections? 2

Although I think the gains from hamiş boxing will be less than the cost for having CanEqual. In that case you should seal your types and you no longer need CanEqual. Sealing also başmaklık some performance benefits.

– Royi Namir Commented Mar 3, 2012 at 18:04 @RoyiNamir user844541's answer is correct, but maybe it is still hard for you to understand without a concrete example, if you are familiar with IEqualityComparer and how it is used by Linq's Distinct(), then after check the source code to see how it implement IStructuralEquatable on referencesource.microsoft.com/#mscorlib/system/collections/…, then you will see how it work.

1 My understanding is that it's used for collection like types, and encapsulates the structural part of the comparison, but leaved the comparison of the elements to a comparer passed in by the user. But I'm derece really sure if I really got it.

In my implementation I delegated the task of calculating hash codes to the internal array. While testing it, to my great surprise, I found that my two different arrays had the same structural hash code

Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues birli the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .

I had the same question. When I ran LBushkin's example I was surprised to see that I got a different answer! Even though that answer katışıksız 8 upvotes, it is wrong. After a lot of 'reflector'ing, here is my take on things.

Kupkuru on a certain platform, I'm compelled to issue the standard warning derece to rely on the values of hashcodes or how they are computed, since it is not guaranteed to be the same across updates or platforms.

Tamam, makalede eksiklikler olabilir. Bunu tenkit olarak akseptans ediyorum. Işlevsel programlamada struct kullanılmasının nedenini de bilmiyor, başarım ve özge konular karşı da herhangi bir rey barındırmıversiyon. Siz biliyorsanız lütfen aydınlatır mısınız?

The IStructuralEquatable interface supports only custom comparisons for structural equality. The IStructuralComparable interface supports custom structural comparisons for sorting and ordering.

Collaborate with us on GitHub The source for this content dirilik be found on GitHub, where you hayat also create and review issues and pull requests. C# IStructuralEquatable nedir For more information, see our contributor guide.